ALERT!
This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).
Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.
Journal and News Scan
Most surgeons practice in high income countries, even though the majority of the world’s population lives in low- or middle-income countries. There is a significant disparity between high-income and low-income countries in the number of both cardiac and pediatric cardiac surgeons. The number of nonsurgical cardiovascular surgeons—including interventional cardiologists, cardiac anesthesiologists, perfusionists, technicians, and other health workers—in low-income countries remains unclear, along with where they are distributed. A clear path exists to foster and uphold heart teams with a high socioeconomic return on investment across countries, but failing to take action means that millions of people will continue to suffer from preventable and treatable cardiac conditions each year.
In a recent study comparing modes of cardiac rehabilitation, the authors found that home-based cardiac rehabilitation results in fewer hospitalizations among patients. Because of accessibility issues, many patients who could benefit from cardiac rehabilitation to improve health after cardiac issues do not take advantage of these resources. To remedy this problem, home-based rehabilitation was developed in facilities such as Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), where this study was conducted. Although previous studies have concluded that home-based and center-based rehabilitation result in similar outcomes, this study encompasses previously unstudied diverse and medically complex populations, allowing for a more inclusive result.
Historically, investment in surgical care has been limited in low-income countries, where children are fourteen times more likely to die before age five than in high-income countries. The authors argue that with simple and affordable surgical care, children with treatable illnesses such as congenital anomalies, injuries, and infections could be saved. Networks of physicians funded by charitable donation and driven by commitments from the United Nations are integral to providing necessary surgical care, and the authors emphasize that the global health philanthropy community needs to pivot a larger portion of its focus to surgical programs in underserved countries.
As one of the most challenging medical emergencies, acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is associated with increased mortality even when recognized and treated early. This article from Zara Khachatryan, et. al—recently opened to nonsubscribers—describes the benefits of using valve-sparing aortic root replacement, or the David procedure, in patients with ATAAD. The authors found that, especially in younger patients and those with connective tissue disorders, the David procedure is associated with good preoperative safety and long-term efficacy. When performed effectively by experienced surgeons, valve-sparing aortic root replacement has become a desirable option in treating ATAAD in properly selected patients.