ALERT!

This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

Mechanical Versus Biological Mitral Valve Replacement: Insights From Propensity Score Matching on Survival and Reoperation Rates

Thursday, August 8, 2024

Submitted by

Source

Source Name: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Author(s)

Nina Feirer, Anna Buchner, Melanie Weber, Miriam Lang, Elda Dzilic, Andrea Amabile, Arnar  Geirsson, Teresa Trenkwalder, Markus Krane, Keti Vitanova

Determining the appropriate prosthetic for mitral valve replacement is an ongoing area of study. This article looked at trends at a single center over a period of 20 years and compared the use of biologic (1,658 patients) and mechanical valves (369 patients). Survival among groups was similar, however, patients with mechanical valves had significantly lower incidence for reoperation overall. The researchers discuss the established durability of mechanical valves, pitfalls of selection bias in patients of different age groups and across eras, and they share comparisons with existing data in the literature from other centers of excellence.
 

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments