ALERT!

This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

Multiarterial vs Single-Arterial Coronary Surgery: Ten-Year Follow-Up of One Million Patients

Thursday, September 19, 2024

Submitted by

Source

Source Name: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Author(s)

Joseph F. Sabik, III, J. Hunter Mehaffey, Vinay Badhwar, Marc Ruel, Patrick O. Myers, Sigrid Sandner, Faisal Bakaeen, John Puskas, David Taggart, Thomas Schwann, Joanna Chikwe, Thomas E. MacGillivray, Abel Kho, Robert H. Habib

This study examined the long-term survival of patients undergoing multiarterial grafting (MAG) versus single-arterial grafting (SAG) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). After analyzing data from more than one million CABG patients, researchers found that MAG led to significantly better survival rates at 10 years, with both unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios. MAG was also found to have an overall survival advantage over SAG in all subgroups, including stable coronary disease, acute coronary syndrome, and acute infarction.  Superior survival with SAG was only associated with patients who have a body mass index ≥40 kg/m 2. 

Comments

I think after this study, there is no excuse not to use multiple arterial grafts in every patient except morbid obese ones

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments