ALERT!

This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

Comparative Study of the Frozen Elephant Trunk and Classical Elephant Trunk Techniques to Supplement Total Arch Replacement for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Wednesday, April 24, 2019

Submitted by

Source

Source Name: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Author(s)

Yosuke Inoue, Hitoshi Matsuda, Atsushi Omura, Yoshimasa Seike, Kyokun Uehara, Hiroaki Sasaki, Junjiro Kobayashi

In 148 patients with type A aortic dissection who underwent emergency total arch replacement, 155 had a conventional elephant trunk procedure (CET, age 65 ± 12 years) and 33 had a frozen elephant trunk procedure (FET, 67 ± 11 years). Early mortality was similar in the two groups (8.7% with CET versus 6.1% with FET). The FET group showed advantages of false lumen thrombosis and aortic remodeling at early follow-up examinations.

Comments

Typing mistake in the 3rd line, the convential group is 115 not 155.

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments