ALERT!

This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

A comparison of outcomes between bovine pericardial and porcine valves in 38 040 patients in England and Wales over 10 years

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

Submitted by

Source

Source Name: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Author(s)

Hickey GL, Grant SW, Bridgewater B, Kendall S, Bryan AJ, Kuo J, Dunning J

This study utilised data form the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit to compare re-intervention free survival between porcine and bovine pericardial aortic valves. All elective or urgent aortic valve replacements with or without coronary artery surgery between 2003 and 2013 were included with a median follow-up time of 3.6 years. There was no difference in in-hospital mortality, survival (10-year survival of 49.0% and 50.3% in the bovine pericardial and porcine groups respectively) or re-intervention free survival between the groups. After adjustment there was a trend towards improved re-intervention free survival in younger patients (<60) who received porcine valves. 

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments