ALERT!

This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Analysis of the PARTNER Trials

Wednesday, June 5, 2024

Submitted by

Source

Source Name: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Author(s)

Vinod H. Thourani, Amr E. Abbas, Julien Ternacle, Rebecca T. Hahn, Raj Makkar, Susheel K. Kodali, Isaac George, Samir Kapadia, Lars G. Svensson, Wilson Y. Szeto, Howard C. Herrmann, Gorav Ailawadi, Jonathon Leipsic, Philipp Blanke, John Webb, Wael A. Jaber, Mark Russo, S. Chris Malaisrie, Pradeep Yadav, Marie-Annick Clavel, Omar K. Khalique, Neil J. Weissman, Pamela Douglas, Jeroen Bax, Abdellaziz Dahou, Ke Xu, Vinayak Bapat, Maria C. Alu, Martin B. Leon, Michael J. Mack, Philippe Pibarot

In an analysis of 1,826 patients randomized to surgical aortic valve replacement in the three Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trials, patient-prosthesis mismatch was assessed using transthoracic echocardiography and by the normal reference value for each size and model of implanted valve. Compared with transthoracic echocardiography (21.6 percent), reference values underestimated the incidence of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (2.1 percent), which was associated with worse all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalizations at the two year follow-up.

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments