ALERT!
This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).
Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.
Journal and News Scan
This article evaluates the effectiveness of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (IC+Chemo) in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This large-scale study involved 1,092 patients from 11 medical centers and compared outcomes between those who received IC+Chemo and those who received chemotherapy alone. Key findings show significantly better outcomes for the IC+Chemo group, with higher rates of pathologic complete response (32.8 percent) and disease-free survival (82 percent) at two years. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma benefited the most from the combined treatment. Additionally, adjuvant therapy following surgery was identified as a critical factor in improving long-term survival, particularly in patients with lower pathologic responses.
This study validates the superiority of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in improving survival outcomes for NSCLC, helping surgeons and oncologists in refining treatment strategies for better patient care.
There is limited data available from randomized trials comparing outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgery in patients with different risks and follow-up periods of at least four years or longer. In this population-based cohort study, long-term mortality and morbidity were investigated in 18,882 patients in Austria undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for severe aortic stenosis using a surgically implanted bioprosthesis. The primary outcome assessed was all-cause mortality in the overall and propensity score-matched populations, with secondary outcomes of reoperation and cardiovascular events. The study found that selection for TAVR was significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality compared to SAVR in patients 65 years and older with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis over a follow-up period exceeding two years.
This study evaluates the early safety of a new technique called branched stented anastomosis frozen elephant trunk repair (B-SAFER) for treating multisegment thoracic aortic disease, which aims to improve outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing total aortic arch replacement. A total of 178 patients were enrolled between May 27, 2021, and December 31, 2022, with varying aortic conditions, including acute syndrome, chronic dissection, degenerative aneurysm, and congenital disorders.
Patients underwent surgery using different configurations of stented anastomoses. The procedure involved median cardiopulmonary bypass time of 188 minutes, and 97 percent of patients underwent antegrade cerebral perfusion for a median of 46 minutes. The study found an operative mortality rate of 5.6 percent, with additional serious complications including disabling stroke (2.9 percent), respiratory failure (11.4 percent), and acute kidney injury (10 percent). Survival rates were 95 percent at 30 days, 88 percent at 90 days, 84 percent at six months, and 79 percent at one year, with variability based on the underlying aortic condition.
Overall, B-SAFER demonstrated early safety and effectiveness, but further follow-up is needed to refine the technique and develop new devices.
This retrospective study compared outcomes for 90-day mortality and five-year overall survival estimates in patients who underwent lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection for stage c-IA lung carcinoma between 2016-2022. Of the 19,453 patients, 72.2 percent underwent lobectomy, 21.5 percent underwent segmentectomy and 6.3 percent underwent wedge resection. The multivariable proportional hazards regression analysis found that wedge resection was associated with worse overall survival compared to lobectomy, with no significant difference between lobectomy and segmentectomy. The authors’ analysis of contemporary real-world patients with clinical stage IA lung carcinoma supports lobectomy as the reference treatment in daily practice for those able to undergo surgery.
This study investigated the impact of complete revascularization (CR) versus incomplete revascularization (IR) on long-term survival in patients who underwent multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with either multiple arterial grafts (MAG) or a single artery with saphenous vein grafts (SAG). The analysis revealed that IR did not negatively affect long-term survival in patients who received MAG but was linked to lower survival rates in those receiving SAG. Specifically, patients with MAG IR had better long-term outcomes than those with SAG IR. Furthermore, CR combined with MAG resulted in better long-term survival compared to CR with SAG. Within the MAG cohort, no significant survival differences were observed among patients with perfect CR, imperfect CR, and IR. However, in the SAG cohort, perfect CR was associated with better survival compared to imperfect CR and IR. The study supports the advantage of MAG over SAG in terms of long-term survival, regardless of CR or IR status. The benefit of MAG may be attributed to better graft patency and reduced progression of atherosclerosis compared to SAG. The results suggest that MAG is preferable even when CR is not achievable. The limitations of this study include potential biases inherent in observational studies and a lack of functional assessment of IR.
The long-term benefits of total arch replacement (TAR) versus hemiarch replacement for treating aortic dissection have been debated, with most studies showing no difference in survival rates between the two methods. However, TAR may be more effective in preventing distal aortic events, particularly in patients under 70 years old. This study analyzed data to determine if age affects the benefits of TAR. The findings suggest that patients younger than 70-years-old benefit more from distal extended surgery to address primary entry tears in the descending aorta. In contrast, older patients (70 years and older) do not experience significant long-term benefits from TAR compared to hemiarch replacement. The study used a cutoff of 70 years based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) supports these findings, noting more extensive dissection and organ malperfusion in younger patients. Although TAR with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique has shown promising results, especially in younger patients, the risks and benefits must be carefully weighed. The study concludes that aggressive TAR may be more beneficial for younger patients, while hemiarch replacement could suffice for older patients, even when the primary tear remains in the descending aorta.
The AVATAR Trial addressed the question of when and how to treat asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function. In the current report, the authors present the extended follow-up. The AVATAR trial randomly assigned patients with severe, asymptomatic AS (negative exercise stress testing in all patients) and LV ejection fraction greater than 50 percent to undergo either early surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or conservative treatment with a watchful waiting strategy. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned hospitalization for heart failure (HF). A total of 157 low-risk patients were randomly assigned to either the early SAVR group (n=78) or the conservative treatment group (n=79). In an intention-to-treat analysis, after a median follow-up of 63 months, the primary composite endpoint outcome event occurred in 18 out of 78 patients (23.1 percent) in the early SAVR group and 37 out of 79 patients (46.8 percent) in the conservative treatment group (hazard ratio (HR) early SAVR versus conservative treatment 0.42; 95 percent confidence interval (CI) 0.24–0.73, p=0.002). The Kaplan-Meier estimates for individual endpoints of all-cause death and HF hospitalization were significantly lower in the early SAVR group compared to the conservative group (HR 0.44; 95 percent CI 0.23–0.85, p=0.012 for all-cause death, and HR 0.21; 95 percent CI 0.06–0.73, p=0.007 for HF hospitalizations). The authors conclude that after an extended follow-up, asymptomatic patients with severe AS and normal LV ejection demonstrate better clinical outcomes with early SAVR than patients treated with conservative treatment and watchful waiting.
This study examined whether potassium supplementation at a lower threshold (below 3.6 mEq/L) is as effective as the standard practice (below 4.5 mEq/L) in preventing atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. A trial involving 1,690 patients at 23 cardiac surgical centers showed no significant difference in new-onset atrial fibrillation or other clinical outcomes between the two groups. The findings suggest that the current practice of maintaining high-normal potassium levels postoperatively can be reconsidered, potentially lowering healthcare costs and minimizing unnecessary interventions.
CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TNB) has allowed for increased detection of small pulmonary nodules in lung cancer patients. However, it also poses a risk of iatrogenic damage. This single-center study aimed to investigate the risk profile of preoperative CT-guided TNB. A total of 1,077 patients with stage 1A non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no visceral pleural invasion was included; 190 of whom underwent preoperative TNB and 823 were in the non-TNB group. Postoperative CT-TNB surveillance was monitored for locoregional recurrence, and propensity score-matched cohorts were compared. The locoregional five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the non-TNB cohort was 96.8 percent and 88.3 percent in the TNB cohort, with no significant difference observed. In the TNB cohort, 21.6 percent of patients experienced post-TNB pneumothorax. Based on multivariable analysis, the history of TNB was a risk factor for locoregional recurrence and a negative prognostic factor for both locoregional and overall RFS. While not conclusive, the high rate of complications associated with TNB and its effect on RFS should be considered when offering TNB preoperatively to those with early-stage lung cancer.
This article provides a detailed overview of using composite outcomes in clinical trials, particularly in cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. The main takeaways include the advantages of composite endpoints in increasing statistical power by combining multiple relevant outcomes, which can reduce sample size and improve trial feasibility. However, the authors also highlight key issues such as the potential for bias, the halo effect, and the importance of carefully selecting and interpreting composite outcomes. They emphasize the necessity of analyzing individual components within a composite to avoid misleading conclusions about treatment efficacy. The article also discusses the win ratio approach, a method that prioritizes clinically important outcomes when evaluating composite endpoints. Understanding the nuances of this statistical method is crucial for interpreting trial results and optimizing patient care.